Whizz bang – why should i be made to feel so far behind?

I’ve decided that I’ve been around long enough to be able to say … stop trying to make me feel like a failure, in not being able to ‘keep up’. I do a damned good job at my work which is to educate, to engage, to facilitate students to think beyond and outside what they know already. To challenge themselves and each other. To challenge me, and what I know, because I’m not here in my role to ‘make you think like me’…

At this moment, I am tired of finding myself not being able to follow something because of the language being used to talk about things I actually do know about, of feeling like a twit because when someone jumps around on a keyboard to show me something I can’t follow – even though I know my own keyboard and speed of responding perfectly well, and it works for what I need to do with it. That I have used and developed my skills with utilising multiple platforms to run damned engaging learning experiences (aka seminars) for my students – including Powerpoint (oh no!!!!) in conjunction with Zoom, breakout rooms, small and large discussions, shared documents that can be a shared record of 6 different conversations being had at the same time, and kept as a record of that moment and looked back upon to reflect on how learning and knowledge might have progressed since then, or to remember issues raised by peers that you hadn’t thought of before yourself.

I’m not being ‘academic’ here, I’m afraid I can’t give you a list of references to support my ranting. Probably due to the same reasons why, at my age and stage of life, I don’t care about publishing in A grade journals or being cited numerous times because I have been so clever at commercialising myself as a brand, and improving my (what are those metrics for measuring academic success???? I don’t know because I don’t care) status. Cleverly planting my name where it will be most noticed and most revered, creating my own metrics to ensure those aforementioned (not mentioned because I can’t remember what they’re called) status statuses have a wide distribution.

Today I ran 2 seminars about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education. Amongst other content, I shared this quote:

Sir Baldwin Spencer

I was informed that there is a building on the UniMelbourne campus named after the man who said this about Aboriginal people. That he would have been quoted as an ‘expert’ in his field, over an unfortunately long period of time. I’m not privy to this history, but the conversation that ensued with the group of Pre Service teachers, was exhilarating. Anger, surprise, new awareness (in terms of their role as 21st century educators), confusion, discussions of power, influence, voice…

Skipping back to the topic, this is content delivered via Powerpoint/Zoom. This was a wonderful moment in an environment of learning and discovery. This was part of a 2 hour block that I was the instigator of – controlling, revealing, timing of activities, listening to students, ensuring they had opportunities to explore these issues amongst themselves, based on pre-readings/viewing/listening. Part of my expertise is being able to respond to what is being discussed by them, knowing when to give them more time or perhaps a cue to provoke deeper considerations.

Over the last year I have got a lot better at doing this with the tools available. I’m yet to see a demonstration of any tool that would improve on this process. I am open to challenging myself and trying out new things – I attended a zoom seminar last night while lying in bed (9pm Hong Kong time, 12 midnight here!) and the facilitator made great use of quick quizzes. Really interesting questions that I answered honestly and avidly. Unfortunately she did not share the information gleaned from these quizzes back to us the participants – so it was really for her own benefit not ours. Which makes me think, again and again, for whose benefit are we using these whiz bang tools? Is it even worth the effort?

Teacher/Academics & ‘content generation’

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/academics-arent-content-creators-and-its-regressive-make-them-so

A video by a professor for only their class is akin to the single-copy, handwritten book disseminated to just one room of people, says David KellermannMarch 8, 2021David Kellermann

Suddenly academics became video editors – mostly bad ones – and our students turned to YouTube, because on YouTube you can get a better explanation of the same thing (for free I might add). Universities turned from communities of learning and collaboration into B-grade content providers. This is the death march of higher education. Universities are not content providers. Somewhere along this unplanned journey we lost our way.

(quote from linked article – see URL above)

An interesting article being shared by my colleagues working in Education. There is a lot of frustration in different university contexts, relating to institutional demands and expectations relating to teaching academics using technology for teaching, recording and thereby creating a resource, owned by the university, for which the producer, the teacher/academic, is not in control of. Another consequence is that as a sessional/casual/contract staff member, our work (or our performance) is not rewarded beyond our per hour of ‘teaching’ wage, and the fear is, that we will no longer be required and hence, no longer earn an income from our work.

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/dead-professors-course-alerts-faculty-covid-era-rights

I have colleagues who are forced to record their seminars, raising the question of who then ‘owns the content & IP’ (the corporation), which is not negotiated or remunerated, At the moment, working with UniMelb, we do not record our seminars and there is an 80% hurdle attendance requirement. This would seem very harsh to my last two HE employers – we need to be ‘flexible’, students need to be able to access lectures/seminars in their own time, we couldn’t possibly ‘force’ them to attend when it suits us. I’m sure there are studies out there, but in my humble experience, as soon as that expectation is removed, not only does attendance drop, but even ‘views’, engagement with materials and any kind of useful discussion all drop. And not only that, this is recorded by the Technology systems now in place. (Very interested if anyone can recommend any research in this area).

As a case in point (which I’m sure is familiar to others), I taught in a core unit for an education subject in 2015, at a particular university in Melbourne, with over 300 students enrolled. I had a weekly one hour lecture which was recorded and made available to students doing the course. I never had more than 20 people in the lecture theatre, which dropped to around 4 – one of whom was a note taker for a student with a disability. I thought that was ok until I found out how to check how many students had watched the lecture on line. The numbers consistently dropped week by week. Worse than that, it became clear that students did not even view the full hour. (This is from memory, I think I’m still in shock and humiliation…)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266173812_Why_do_Students_still_Bother_Coming_to_Lectures_When_Everything_is_Available_Online

Yes, there were take-away messages from this experience, and I might have improved my ‘style’ since then, but this seemed to be foreboding for the future of university learning, effort and engagement. I know that my planning was good, multi modes, engaging content, opportunities for discussion … but what could I do to get students to attend? ‘Good’ students passed their assignments because they knew how to respond appropriately, and not so good students struggled, but few failed. What did the content of the lectures even have to do with passing the subject, which was the main consideration of most students?

I may have crossed over a few topic areas here, but here in 2021, working with UniMelb (atm), all online zoom seminars, the students I’ve been working with have been overwhelmingly grateful, enthusiastic, engaged and collaborative . It is still online (not recorded) but I’m hopeful and no longer having to feel the kind of humiliation I did in my memory above. I’m looking forward to considering more about what students want, and what we as teacher academics, are willing and able to provide. And developing my competence at facilitating learning through online platforms.

Links to my sites

Digging up all the Apps/sites/platforms that I’ve used over the years. Pulling up passwords from the dark ages! I guess I am grateful for Google’s memory because mine is not so good… But nice to see evidence that I have been at this for years, just not too consistently.

Edit: I have now set up my ORCID reference, providing a central location for all the information from various sources https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3935-6982 – still in the process of consolidating, updating and re-establishing my online presence!

www.linkedin.com/in/Dr-annabelle-leve-a9010a3b
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Annabelle-Leve
https://unimelb.academia.edu/AnnabelleLeve
screenshot of front page of abelspace blog
https://abelspace.edublogs.org/files/2021/03/Abelspace-front-page.png Started June 2016

COM_COM_000848ModulesWeek2Digital Literacies & Ecologies of resources

Reflections on week 2 Digital Literacies & Ecologies of Resources

This is my (final) result of an exercise, using http://experimental.worldcat.org/vandrmapping/signIn

A useful exercise that does get you thinking about tools that you use, and in what domains (personal/institutional) and whether you are a creator and/or viewer (Resident/visitor)

In response to the critique of the Digital Native narrative popularised by Prensky, David White proposed the “Visitors and Residents” (VandR) framework of technology adoption. JISC subsequently utilised the VandR mapping exercise within their Digital Literacies framework and guides. The VandR mapping exercise provides a quick visual map of how students and academics interact with various technologies in the Institutional (or Professional) and Personal (or Social) domains. It also highlights the potential for rethinking how various tools can be used within a more professional domain rather than merely within a social or personal domain.

See more: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7802/6515

During the process of using this tool, I was frustrated by the fact that I spent time on thinking it through and completing it (between various other interruptions) but with no warning, I had to redo the exercise 3 times. What I shared above was a screen grab, after losing my map 3 times already…

I made a comment in response to this on the open forum … It seems I wasn’t the only one to have lost their hard work!

Yes (grrr, don’t have this time to waste).  Maybe this is the type of thing we need to ensure that we are aware of pitfalls, and when we ask students to use these types of platforms, we ensure they are well placed to know what they should/shouldn’t do, otherwise, as Caitlin said above, we will most probably be considerably less enthusiastic, not only to repeat the exercise but in using this tool ourselves in our teaching.  Is this our responsibility as lecturers/tutors/course writers etc, or simply a matter of those who can’t hack it, don’t belong?  

Who has had to deal with Centrelink, or MyGov, and lost everything they’ve written because it has ‘timed out’?  But where is the warning that you have x number of minutes to complete or you’ll lose it all?  What’s the bloody rush?  Hate this!

I showed my daughter (she is 11, grade 6, and an expert user of many digital platforms on her ipad with which she is far closer to resident and producer status than I ever will be) and she gets it. She was interested in the different ideas of being a consumer vs a producer of content – is this different to what is being mapped here? I think too that like mother like daughter, there is not a huge divide between what they term ‘personal’ and ‘institutional’ usage – they cross over in many ways, particularly since our 2020 lockdown experiences.

Skip to toolbar